「みんな」って、いったい何人?
How Many Is 'Everyone,' Really?
A post claiming "everyone hates the new school uniform" gets thousands of likes in a single afternoon. It feels like proof. It isn't.
Online, a claim about "everyone" rarely comes from counting anyone at all. It comes from noticing that people who already agree are the ones most likely to comment, share, and pile on — while people who don't care, or who quietly disagree, simply scroll past. The loudest hundred voices can look exactly like a majority, even inside a school of a thousand students.
The same pattern plays out with online reviews. A product with hundreds of five-star reviews and a handful of furious one-star ones can look almost universally loved — until you notice that satisfied customers rarely bother writing anything at all, while a single bad experience is often the exact thing that pushes someone to sit down and type. A star rating counts opinions volunteered, not opinions held.
This is not a reason to dismiss a popular opinion outright. Strong feelings are still real feelings, and worth taking seriously. But "lots of people are saying it" and "most people believe it" are two different claims, and only one of them can be checked with an actual number.
Before repeating "everyone thinks so," it helps to ask a smaller, more answerable question: out of how many people, exactly? A show of hands in one classroom, a short anonymous survey, even a rough headcount — any of these turns a feeling into a number you can actually trust.
248 words
Vocabulary Check
"...comment, share, and pile on" — here, "pile on" is closest to —
- join in enthusiastically, often against one target
- stay completely silent
- apologize for a mistake
- change the subject
答えを見る
正解:A.join in enthusiastically, often against one target
"...a reason to dismiss a popular opinion outright" — here, "dismiss" is closest to —
- carefully study
- reject without serious consideration
- strongly recommend
- politely question
答えを見る
正解:B.reject without serious consideration
As used in the passage, "outright" is closest to —
- gradually
- completely, without qualification
- secretly
- occasionally
答えを見る
正解:B.completely, without qualification
"A show of hands in one classroom" refers to —
- a formal written vote
- people raising their hands to indicate agreement
- a teacher calling on students
- a classroom discussion
答えを見る
正解:B.people raising their hands to indicate agreement
In this context, "a rough headcount" means —
- an approximate count of people
- a survey about hairstyles
- a list of names
- an opinion poll result
答えを見る
正解:A.an approximate count of people
"...simply scroll past" describes people who —
- leave an angry comment
- share the post with friends
- move on without reacting
- report the post
答えを見る
正解:C.move on without reacting
"The loudest hundred voices" — here, "loudest" describes people who are —
- speaking in a literal loud voice
- the most vocal and visible online
- the most knowledgeable
- the youngest users
答えを見る
正解:B.the most vocal and visible online
Comprehension
What is the passage's main point about claims that "everyone" thinks a certain way online?
- Such claims are usually deliberate lies.
- Such claims often reflect who reacted most, not an actual count.
- Such claims are always accurate if they get enough likes.
- Such claims are impossible to check.
答えを見る
正解:B.Such claims often reflect who reacted most, not an actual count.
第2段落が明示する通り、"everyone"という発言は実数のカウントからではなく、反応した人の偏りから生まれる、というのが本文の中心的な主張。
According to the passage, why can "the loudest hundred voices" look like a majority?
- Because disagreeing users are usually banned.
- Because people who disagree or don't care tend to stay quiet and scroll past.
- Because the platform hides opposing opinions.
- Because a hundred is always more than half.
答えを見る
正解:B.Because people who disagree or don't care tend to stay quiet and scroll past.
気にしない人や反対の人は黙ってスクロールするだけなので、発言・反応した人だけを見ると意見が偏って見える、という第2段落の説明。
According to the passage, why can a product's star rating be misleading?
- Because online reviews are usually fake.
- Because satisfied customers rarely write reviews, while a small number of angry customers are much more likely to, skewing the visible opinions.
- Because star ratings are calculated incorrectly by most websites.
- Because five-star reviews count for more than one-star reviews.
答えを見る
正解:B.Because satisfied customers rarely write reviews, while a small number of angry customers are much more likely to, skewing the visible opinions.
追加した段落の要点。満足した客はレビューを書かないことが多く、少数の激怒した客が書く確率が高いため、見えている意見に偏りが生まれる、という説明。
Which of the following would the writer NOT agree with?
- A number can be checked; a feeling usually cannot.
- Popular opinions should be dismissed just because they are popular.
- Strong feelings are worth taking seriously.
- Asking "how many, exactly?" is a useful habit.
答えを見る
正解:B.Popular opinions should be dismissed just because they are popular.
第3段落で"Strong feelings are still real feelings, and worth taking seriously"と明言しており、人気意見を軽視せよとは主張していない。
What practical technique does the writer recommend in the final paragraph?
- Ignoring any claim about "everyone."
- Asking for an actual number, such as through a show of hands or survey.
- Only trusting claims made by teachers.
- Waiting a week before forming an opinion.
答えを見る
正解:B.Asking for an actual number, such as through a show of hands or survey.
最終段落で提案されている具体的な行動:挙手・アンケート・概算の人数把握など、実際の数字に変換する方法。
Summary Writing
Summarize the passage in 60–70 words.
モデル要約と解説を見る
A social media post claiming "everyone" feels a certain way often reflects only the loudest, most vocal group, not an actual count. People who agree are more likely to comment and share, while quieter people simply scroll past, making a vocal minority look like a majority. Rather than repeating "everyone thinks so," the writer suggests asking a more specific, checkable question: out of how many people, exactly?
67 words
なぜこの要約になるか
- 元の英文は5段落=「問題提起→具体例①(SNSの反応の偏り)→具体例②(オンラインレビュー)→留保(強く感じることを否定はしない)→実践的な問い」という展開。要約では2つの具体例を1つの一般化した主張(vocal group)に統合し、"strong feelings are still real feelings"という留保部分は省略している。
- "the loudest hundred voices can look exactly like a majority"という具体的な比喩は、そのまま抜き出さず「vocal group」という抽象語に置き換えている。
- 67語という制限の中で、最後の"how many people, exactly?"という問いかけの形は要約の結びとして残し、本文の主張が「行動可能な問い」で終わることを反映させている。
Your Turn
A friend tells you, "Everyone in our class thinks the new school rule is unfair." Before agreeing or disagreeing, what would you want to know first, and why? Write your opinion in English, using 120–150 words.
賛成・反対ではなく「何を確かめたいか」を問う設問。最初の1文で知りたいことを明示し、理由を1〜2つ添える。
使える型
- Before I could agree, I would want to know...
- This matters because...
- For example, ...
- Overall, I think...
考えの道具箱
この英文が扱っているのは、既刊『新聞部、うわさの答え合わせ。』第4章の「何人ルール」と同じ考え方です。「みんな」「たくさん」という言葉が出てきたら、具体的に何人のうち何人なのかを確かめる——これはクラスの噂話だけでなく、SNS上の「バズり」にもそのまま当てはまります。
英語の意見論述でも、"many people think..."と書きたくなったときほど、「実際には何人か」を自分に問い直す癖をつけてください。根拠のない"everyone"は、英検の採点でも説得力のない主張とみなされがちです。
「何人ルール」のページを見る →Read the Original
